The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats provide a detailed look at one of the most interesting first-round matchups of the 2026 NBA playoffs. San Antonio entered the series as the No. 2 seed in the Western Conference, while Portland entered as the No. 7 seed. The Spurs eventually won the series 4–1, advancing after controlling four of the five games.
For basketball fans, the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats are more useful than simply looking at the final series score. Points, rebounds, assists, shooting percentages, blocks, steals and turnovers help explain how each player contributed and why one team ultimately gained the advantage.
The series featured several impressive individual performances. Victor Wembanyama provided San Antonio with scoring, rebounding and elite rim protection. De’Aaron Fox contributed scoring and playmaking, while Stephon Castle emerged as another important offensive option. Portland relied heavily on Deni Avdija, Jrue Holiday and Scoot Henderson.
According to Basketball-Reference, San Antonio won the Western Conference first round 4–1, with the five games taking place between April 19 and April 28, 2026.
This article examines the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats game by game and player by player to explain the most important numbers from the series.
San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers Series Overview
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats changed considerably from game to game, but San Antonio maintained the stronger overall statistical profile.
| Game | Result | Score | Top Scorer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Game 1 | San Antonio won | Spurs 111–98 | Victor Wembanyama – 35 |
| Game 2 | Portland won | Blazers 106–103 | Scoot Henderson – 31 |
| Game 3 | San Antonio won | Spurs 120–108 | Stephon Castle – 33 |
| Game 4 | San Antonio won | Spurs 114–93 | De’Aaron Fox – 28 |
| Game 5 | San Antonio won | Spurs 114–95 | De’Aaron Fox – 21 |
The series was therefore decided in five games, with San Antonio winning 4–1.
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats also show that San Antonio received production from several different players instead of depending on a single scorer.
That balance became especially important in the games when Portland successfully limited one of San Antonio’s primary offensive options.
Victor Wembanyama’s Numbers
Any discussion of the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats has to begin with Victor Wembanyama.
Wembanyama appeared in four of the five games and averaged:
- 21.0 points per game
- 8.8 rebounds per game
- 2.0 assists per game
- 1.0 steal per game
- 4.0 blocks per game
- 58.3% field-goal shooting
- 53.8% three-point shooting
- 91.3% free-throw shooting
He finished the series with 84 points, 35 rebounds, eight assists and 16 blocks.
His impact was particularly clear in Game 1.
Wembanyama scored 35 points, making 13 of 21 field-goal attempts and five of six three-point attempts. He also recorded five rebounds and two blocks as San Antonio defeated Portland 111–98.
Those numbers make Wembanyama one of the central names in the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats discussion.
His efficiency was just as important as his scoring. Shooting above 58% from the field while also making more than half of his three-point attempts created a difficult defensive problem for Portland.
At the other end of the floor, his 4.0 blocks per game changed the way Portland could attack the basket.
De’Aaron Fox’s Contribution
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats also highlight the importance of De’Aaron Fox.
Fox played all five games and averaged:
- 20.2 points
- 4.0 rebounds
- 6.8 assists
- 1.0 steal
- 0.4 blocks
- 50.0% field-goal shooting
- 37.0% three-point shooting
He finished the series with 101 points and 34 assists.
Fox’s scoring was important, but his playmaking may have been even more valuable. His 6.8 assists per game gave San Antonio another player capable of creating scoring opportunities.
His best scoring performance came in Game 4, when he scored 28 points in San Antonio’s 114–93 victory.
In the deciding Game 5, Fox recorded 21 points and nine assists. He also shot 8-of-14 from the field as the Spurs closed out the series.
For that reason, the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats show Fox as one of San Antonio’s most consistent performers throughout the series.
Stephon Castle Emerges as a Major Contributor
Stephon Castle was another important part of the Spurs’ statistical success.
His series averages were:
| Statistic | Average |
|---|---|
| Points | 19.8 |
| Rebounds | 4.0 |
| Assists | 6.0 |
| Steals | 0.8 |
| Blocks | 0.4 |
| Field Goal % | 43.4% |
| Three-Point % | 40.7% |
| Free Throw % | 81.5% |
Castle scored 99 points and recorded 30 assists over the five games.
His biggest offensive performance came in Game 3.
After Portland won Game 2 to tie the series, Castle responded with 33 points in a 120–108 San Antonio victory.
This performance demonstrates why the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats cannot be evaluated only by looking at the highest scorer across the entire series.
Different players stepped forward at different moments.
Castle’s ability to contribute as both a scorer and passer gave San Antonio another layer of offensive flexibility.
Deni Avdija Leads Portland
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats show Deni Avdija as Portland’s leading scorer across the five-game series.
Avdija averaged:
- 22.2 points per game
- 6.0 rebounds
- 4.6 assists
- 0.4 steals
- 0.6 blocks
- 44.9% field-goal shooting
- 35.0% three-point shooting
- 72.3% free-throw shooting
He finished with 111 total points, the highest total among Portland players.
Avdija produced one of his strongest performances in Game 1, scoring 30 points and grabbing 10 rebounds.
Even though Portland lost that game 111–98, Avdija’s performance showed that he could produce against San Antonio’s defense.
His 22.2 points per game were actually higher than the individual scoring average of any San Antonio player. However, the Spurs had three players averaging close to 20 points per game.
That difference in scoring depth is one of the clearest lessons from the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats.
Jrue Holiday’s Playmaking
Jrue Holiday provided Portland with veteran experience and strong playmaking.
His series averages were:
- 16.4 points
- 5.4 rebounds
- 7.2 assists
- 1.4 steals
- 0.4 blocks
- 40.3% field-goal shooting
- 35.3% three-point shooting
- 88.9% free-throw shooting
Holiday recorded 36 assists across the five games, making him Portland’s leading playmaker.
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats show that Holiday was particularly valuable as a facilitator.
However, his 40.3% shooting from the field illustrates one of Portland’s problems. The Trail Blazers needed efficient scoring from their primary creators, but San Antonio’s defense made scoring opportunities difficult.
Holiday still contributed across multiple categories, but San Antonio’s combination of length, rim protection and perimeter defense helped limit Portland’s offensive efficiency.
Scoot Henderson’s Game 2 Performance
Scoot Henderson created one of the biggest surprises in the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats when he scored 31 points in Game 2.
Portland won that game 106–103, tying the series at 1–1.
Across all five games, Henderson averaged:
- 15.0 points
- 1.6 rebounds
- 1.2 assists
- 0.8 steals
- 47.5% field-goal shooting
- 46.4% three-point shooting
He made 13 of 28 three-point attempts during the series.
His Game 2 scoring performance was especially important because San Antonio was without Wembanyama for that contest.
Henderson took advantage of the opportunity and helped Portland secure its only victory of the series.
This is another reason the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats should be examined game by game rather than only through series averages.
Key Player Statistics Compared
A direct comparison makes the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats easier to understand.
| Player | Team | PPG | RPG | APG | FG% | 3P% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deni Avdija | Portland | 22.2 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 44.9% | 35.0% |
| Victor Wembanyama | San Antonio | 21.0 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 58.3% | 53.8% |
| De’Aaron Fox | San Antonio | 20.2 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 50.0% | 37.0% |
| Stephon Castle | San Antonio | 19.8 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 43.4% | 40.7% |
| Jrue Holiday | Portland | 16.4 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 40.3% | 35.3% |
| Scoot Henderson | Portland | 15.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 47.5% | 46.4% |
The table reveals an important difference.
Portland’s top scorer, Avdija, averaged 22.2 points. However, San Antonio had Wembanyama, Fox and Castle all producing between 19.8 and 21.0 points per game.
That depth allowed the Spurs to maintain their offensive output even when one player was not having a particularly strong night.
Team-Level Statistics
Individual numbers tell only part of the story.
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats become more meaningful when combined with the team’s overall performance.
San Antonio averaged:
- 112.4 points per game
- 44.4 rebounds per game
- 24.6 assists per game
Portland averaged:
- 100.0 points per game
- 40.6 rebounds per game
- 21.4 assists per game
San Antonio therefore held a substantial advantage in scoring, rebounding and assists.
The Spurs scored 12.4 more points per game and collected 3.8 more rebounds per game than Portland during the series. Their assist advantage was 3.2 per game.
These numbers help explain the final 4–1 result.
Why San Antonio Won
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats point toward several major reasons for San Antonio’s victory.
Better Scoring Balance
San Antonio did not rely entirely on one scorer.
Wembanyama, Fox and Castle all averaged close to 20 points per game.
That balance made it difficult for Portland to focus its defensive strategy on one player.
Strong Interior Defense
Wembanyama averaged four blocks per game during his four appearances.
His ability to protect the rim forced Portland to think carefully about drives and close-range attempts.
Better Rebounding
San Antonio averaged 44.4 rebounds compared with Portland’s 40.6.
The additional rebounds helped the Spurs create extra possessions and limit Portland’s second-chance opportunities.
More Consistent Playmaking
Fox averaged 6.8 assists and Castle averaged 6.0 assists.
Together, their playmaking gave San Antonio multiple ways to create offense.
Portland’s Holiday averaged 7.2 assists, but the Spurs had greater secondary creation around their main ball handlers.
Efficient Shooting
Wembanyama shot 58.3% from the field and 53.8% from three during the series.
Fox also shot 50% from the field.
Those numbers were significant because efficient shooting reduced the number of possessions San Antonio needed to generate its scoring totals.
Game 1: Wembanyama Sets the Tone
Game 1 was an early indication of what the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats would look like throughout the series.
San Antonio won 111–98, with Wembanyama scoring 35 points.
Fox added 17 points and eight assists, while Castle also scored 17 points and contributed seven assists.
For Portland, Avdija scored 30 points and collected 10 rebounds.
Despite Avdija’s excellent performance, the Spurs’ overall balance proved too much.
Game 2: Portland Fights Back
Portland responded in Game 2.
The Trail Blazers won 106–103, with Henderson scoring 31 points.
This game became an important part of the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats because it demonstrated Portland’s ability to compete when its guards created efficient scoring opportunities.
The victory also tied the series at 1–1.
However, it would ultimately be Portland’s only win.
Game 3: Castle Responds
San Antonio answered immediately in Game 3.
The Spurs won 120–108, with Castle scoring 33 points.
His performance was important because San Antonio needed a major offensive contribution after dropping Game 2.
The win gave San Antonio a 2–1 series advantage and shifted momentum back toward the higher-seeded Spurs.
Game 4: Fox Takes Control
Game 4 produced another strong San Antonio performance.
The Spurs won 114–93, with Fox leading the team in scoring.
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats from this game also highlight Wembanyama’s defensive impact.
He recorded 18 points and five rebounds in limited minutes while also registering five blocks. Fox finished with 18 points and four assists in the portion of the game represented in the box-score data.
San Antonio moved ahead 3–1 and needed only one more victory to finish the series.
Game 5: San Antonio Finishes the Job
The deciding Game 5 ended with another 114–95 Spurs victory.
Fox scored 21 points and delivered nine assists.
Wembanyama recorded 17 points, 14 rebounds and six blocks. His six blocks were one of the most notable defensive figures in the deciding game.
Julian Champagnie also made a significant contribution, scoring 19 points while making five three-pointers.
For Portland, Avdija finished with 22 points.
The result gave San Antonio a 4–1 series victory.
What the Statistics Tell Us
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats provide several useful lessons about playoff basketball.
First, the highest individual scorer does not necessarily play for the winning team. Avdija averaged 22.2 points, the highest figure among the primary players listed, but Portland lost the series.
Second, efficiency matters.
Wembanyama’s 58.3% field-goal percentage and Fox’s 50% mark helped San Antonio turn possessions into points more effectively.
Third, defensive statistics can be just as important as scoring.
Wembanyama’s 4.0 blocks per game were a major part of San Antonio’s defensive advantage.
Finally, depth matters in a playoff series.
San Antonio had multiple players capable of scoring 20 or more points on a given night. Castle’s 33-point Game 3 performance and Fox’s 28-point Game 4 performance are good examples.
ThomsonKids.com and Sports Content
Digital publications increasingly cover sports alongside technology, lifestyle, education, business, finance and other subjects. thomsonkids.com follows this broader digital-publication approach, making sports statistics and analysis part of a wider content ecosystem.
For readers interested in basketball, an article covering the san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats can provide a useful starting point for understanding individual performances and team trends.
The internal reference to thomsonkids.com can also connect sports readers with other relevant categories on the publication without distracting from the main basketball topic.
Final Analysis
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats make it clear why San Antonio advanced after five games.
Deni Avdija was Portland’s leading scorer at 22.2 points per game. Victor Wembanyama averaged 21.0 points and 8.8 rebounds while producing four blocks per game. De’Aaron Fox averaged 20.2 points and 6.8 assists, while Stephon Castle added 19.8 points and 6.0 assists.
For Portland, Jrue Holiday supplied 16.4 points and 7.2 assists per game, while Scoot Henderson averaged 15.0 points and produced the team’s biggest single-game scoring performance with 31 points in Game 2.
But San Antonio’s advantage was not based on one player.
The Spurs combined scoring depth, rebounding, playmaking and interior defense. They averaged 112.4 points per game against Portland’s 100.0 and also held advantages in rebounds and assists.
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats therefore tell a broader story than the final 4–1 series result.
They show how Wembanyama’s defense, Fox’s playmaking, Castle’s scoring and San Antonio’s overall depth worked together.
Portland had strong individual performances, particularly from Avdija and Henderson, but San Antonio consistently found more ways to produce points and control possessions.
For basketball fans analyzing the series, the numbers provide a clear conclusion: Portland had enough individual talent to make the matchup competitive, but San Antonio’s balanced roster and statistical advantages ultimately made the difference.
thomsonkids
Dipti